JURA won by 27 runs
This was the
first instance of a side gaining revenge for a previous defeat and it breathed fresh
life into the title race. When the two teams met in their opening fixture the
game ebbed and flowed and this one was equally keenly fought. CTU had looked a class apart throughout most of their
previous games and so even when their last pair came in needing 52, there was
reason to believe they could fashion a victory. As it was, they fell
comfortably short and their team suffered their first defeat. They actually
scored eight more runs than JURA overall, but lost seven more wickets.
CTU came in
from the cold, both literally and metaphorically, and one can only speculate
how much this impacted on their performance. Certainly their fielding was below
its usual high standards and they were also unusually wayward with the ball at
times. JURA’s openers, Hanzaq and Chris, were calmness personified. They took full advantage of CTU keeping their
field deep, clocking up plenty of runs just in front of and just behind square
and they were happy not to chase the wider offerings. The fact CTU spilled
several fairly regulation chances shows that the batsmen did not completely abandon
arial shots but nevertheless, JURA managed to amass 88 without hitting a single
boundary.
After
reaching 38 in four overs JURA looked well placed but CTU bounced back in the
next four. The first wicket fell when Ty finally moved up from cover to short
cover and caught Alex. Saul had bowled 3 wides in his first over but by
gripping the ball across the seam he was later able to prevent it swinging
excessively. This tactic can also lead to a heavier delivery that doesn’t
bounce as much as those with a more orthodox seam angle and Alex was out again
when he swung over the top of one that was well short of a length but still hit
the stumps around three-quarters of the way up.
This meant
JURA were just 52 after 8 overs and the momentum was back with CTU but Javid
and Rich stuck to the plan and added a further 36 without loss. It was
extremely judicious cricket. If the ball wasn’t there to hit then they didn’t
try to. They worked many balls behind square and they called and ran well but
although they were always alert they were never greedy and took no unnecessary
risks.
JURA’s total
was certainly competitive but it was far from job done for them. CTU’s openers,
Charlie and AJ, took a more combative approach than their opposite numbers but
the results were ultimately similar. Including a 6, Charlie and AJ scored 49
net runs but they lost two wickets, one being an outstanding catch by keeper
Rich running to square leg. Still, at 39
after 4 overs, CTU looked to be in the stronger position and JURA knew they
would have to make something happen.
They did this
partly through their fielding, for which brilliance has now become the norm.
This may not have been absolutely their finest display but they remained
assured and controlled at a time when it would have been easy to let the
pressure tell. For their bowlers, Javid in particular stepped up to the plate. He
achieved success without looking for dramatic movement or magic balls but by
finding an immaculately straight line and full length. He was hard to work away
even when the batsmen were only looking to nudge and nurdle for ones and twos.
Consequently, more CTU wickets fell. JURA had had reason to fear that their
middle pair only adding 14 would be where they lost the game but Ty and Saul
made -2 net runs for CTU and suddenly the table toppers were in trouble.
52 proved too
much for Trappa and Matt. They began in earnest and found the boundary but JURA
were not about to choke. Maintaining an accurate line with the ball and
concentrated focus in the field allowed them to pick up three more wickets and
stymie any potential last gasp heroics. In the end, the game was up with
something to spare and in the last over or two the only real issue was the size
of the swing in the run rate. The result was probably satisfactory and
unsatisfactory for both sides in equal measure. JURA have taken the title race
down to the last week but they have not inflicted a telling wound in terms of
run rates. CTU failed to wrap up the title but they know that, barring something
incredulous, the matter is still in their hands.
Both sides deserve enormous credit for playing the game in exactly the right manner. It
was fiercely contested but there were examples of genuine sportsmanship. Javid
escaped with a warning for excessive backing up when batting - this may be
etiquette but the laws allow for instant dismissal. Then CTU’s keeper AJ
admitted to not having removed the bails cleanly after both umpires had agreed
a run out should be given. Later, when AJ was batting he was involved in an
accidental collision with Hanzaq that stopped him completing an easy run. JURA’s
keeper Rich made no attempt to break the wicket, instead allowing AJ to make
his ground. In the final analysis, none of those actions affected the result but,
at the time, there was every chance they might have.
Inns of : JURA
PAIR NAME
|
SCORE
|
NET RUNS
|
BOWLER NAME
|
OVERS
|
FIGURES
|
|
Hanzaq M
Chris P
|
38-0
|
38
|
Ty
|
2
|
2-20
|
|
Saul
|
2
|
1-17
|
||||
Pete C
Alex S
|
24-2
|
14
|
Trappa
|
3
|
1-21
|
|
Charlie
|
2
|
0-10
|
||||
Javid U
Rich S
|
36-0
|
36
|
Matt
|
1
|
0-12
|
|
AJ
|
2
|
0-18
|
RUNS 98 WKTS 2 NET
TOTAL 88
Inns of : CTU
PAIR NAME
|
SCORE
|
NET TOTAL
|
BOWLER NAME
|
OVERS
|
FIGURES
|
|
Charlie
AJ
|
49-2
|
39
|
Alex S
|
2
|
2-20
|
|
Chris P
|
2
|
1-22
|
||||
Ty
Saul
|
18-4
|
-2
|
Javid U
|
3
|
3-19
|
|
Pete C
|
2
|
2-12
|
||||
Trappa
Matt
|
39-3
|
24
|
Hanzaq M
|
3
|
1-33
|
|
RUNS 106
WKTS 9 NET TOTAL 61
RESULT : JURA WON BY 27 runs
Umpire & Scorer : B. Oliver
No comments:
Post a Comment